In the anatomy of a scholarly research article example, the literature review is a part of the introduction.A poorly written question that is too broad will generate questionable hypotheses, and if your supervisor fails to catch it in time, even more questionable results.Developing the right question requires a rock solid literature review that establishes your expertise as having been so immersed in the topic that you can rightfully vouch for the need for this research question to be asked.It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research.The literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well conceived.Most supervisors will tell you that quality is measured in terms of relevance to your topic, and that your choice should always be quality over quantity.However, that guidance, valuable though it may be, still leaves you with the question as to how much relevant material is enough?There are some simple rules that can be applied: The quality of your review will sink or swim on the efficacy with which you select your search keywords.Too many and you’ll be buried under results for months. How will your topic uniquely contribute to this body of knowledge? Which methodologies have researchers used and which appear to be the most productive? What sources of information or data were identified that might be useful to you? How does your particular topic fit into the larger context of what has already been done? How has the research that has already been done help frame your current investigation?The list of references will include full citations for all of the items mentioned in the lit review.