Please keep that in mind, as well as that this fulfilled a requirement of an The Christian worldview is being attacked from all sides.Tags: Tok Essay Extended EssayEssay On Dr Br AmbedkarEssay Titled BeautyCartoon Character EssayEssays On Importance Of AgricultureNano Car Research PapersOnline Courses In Creative Writing
Most of them have been dead forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years. They had no natural power or right to make it obligatory upon their children.
It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they could bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them.
It is he to whom all will be held ultimately accountable.
Having innate authority as God’s self-disclosure, the Bible demands obedience.
I won’t reproduce the assignment instructions or grading rubric, except to say that it was required to consist of between 600 and 800 words, and to be primarily based upon articles in the second edition of the , published in 2001 by Baker Academic.
Naturally, then, I was limited to the extent I could explore, consider, and respond to arguments against my view, which is that Scripture is, indeed, inerrant.
Whether the pressure is to have sex outside of marriage, to affirm the legitimacy of same-sex relationships, or to permit the murder of unwanted, preborn human beings, it is God who is owed obedience.
His God-breathed, self-revelation has greater authority than those from whom such pressure originates.
However, because the argument can seem circular (the Bible is trustworthy because it claims to be), it’s worth reinforcing with the other arguments Feinberg lists: first, that inerrancy has enjoyed widespread belief throughout Church history, compelling Christians today to defer to the generations of giants upon whose shoulders they stand; second, that trust in any text of Scripture is only justifiable if one can trust all of it, although one is unlikely to concede that all of Scripture is cast into doubt if Ezra and Nehemiah don’t agree on the exact number of Asaph’s sons who returned from Babylon; and third, that denying inerrancy leads to denying other important doctrines, perhaps the weakest argument given the number of otherwise orthodox Christians who reject inerrancy.
Christian critics of inerrancy are not without a rebuttal, but it is not impressive.