Your method section provides a detailed overview of how you conducted your research.
Because your study methods form a large part of your credibility as a researcher and writer, it is imperative that you be clear about what you did to gather information from participants in your study. The method section includes the following sub-sections. Participants: Discuss who was enrolled in your experiment.
Then provide each result as it relates to that story. Preliminary discussion: Sometimes it is necessary to provide a preliminary discussion in your results section about your participant groups.
In order to convince your readers that your results are meaningful, you must first demonstrate that the conditions of the study were met.
The discussion section typically includes the following components: (a) the significance of the study, (b) interpretations of the significant results, (c) implications, (d) limitations, (e) future studies, and (f) conclusion.
The discussion section is placed at the end of the paper or article; but depending on the format required by a course professor or journal, the conclusion might be a separate section following the discussion section.Beginning with the introduction through the major research, one of the final sections, but one of the most important, is the discussion section.In a scientific article, the discussion section allows the researcher to interpret the findings of the results of a study.Your discussion section is where you talk about what your results mean and where you wrap up the overall story you are telling.This is where you interpret your findings, evaluate your hypotheses or research questions, discuss unexpected results, and tie your findings to the previous literature (discussed first in your literature review).For many academicians, the discussion section is a central focus of the ...Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.For example, if you randomly assigned subjects into groups, are these two groups comparable?You can't discuss the differences in the two groups until you establish that the two groups can be compared.Briel begins her discussion section by providing a sentence about her hypotheses—what she expected to find.She immediately follows this with what she did find and then her interpretation of those findings.